workshops · Time-boxed reviews + office hours

Code Review Intensive

Senior-led reviews targeting integration seams, operational hooks, and contract tests.

Pilot

Duration: 3 weeks · Investment (indicative): KRW 1,900,000

Engagement length filter: 4 weeks

Team shape: Core squad (≤8)

Architecture focus: Single product

Request scoped brief

Scope narrative

We sample pull requests across services with guidance that transfers to your reviewers. Sessions emphasize observable outcomes—tests, telemetry hooks, rollback clarity—not bike-shedding style debates.

Included focus areas

Sampling strategy aligned to highest-risk modules
Reviewer calibration sessions with annotated examples
Checklist tuned to your language ecosystem
Guidance on meaningful vs. cosmetic comments
Follow-up async notes within 48 hours
Summary digest for leads without naming individuals

Expected outcomes

Review threads shorten without skipping risk checks
Junior reviewers adopt clearer escalation cues
Shared definition of “merge-ready” across squads

Accountable lead

Yejin Oh

Principal consultant with emphasis on Kotlin and TypeScript service stacks.

Field notes from clients

Code Review Intensive reframed our threads around observability gaps—not formatting wars.

Geonwoo · Staff engineer · 5/5 · survey

Clarifications

We anonymize examples in leadership summaries and focus on patterns.